tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1405318705472934452.post3160209617194435611..comments2022-11-15T02:11:57.743-05:00Comments on Instanceof Idea: My good deed for today - UdpClient in C# joining a multicast groupAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08560846342306382608noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1405318705472934452.post-61598172284611962382012-07-25T10:47:30.070-04:002012-07-25T10:47:30.070-04:00PS: Now, if only it worked so smoothly on a client...PS: Now, if only it worked so smoothly on a client machine that has multiple NIC enabled. Sigh.<br />-JesseUnknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18065880067953920724noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1405318705472934452.post-51805521962548325482012-07-25T10:18:07.348-04:002012-07-25T10:18:07.348-04:00If it was old 4 years ago, then by golly it is anc...If it was old 4 years ago, then by golly it is ancient now. But since it worked out of the chute and helped me ... Kudos, man!<br />-JesseUnknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18065880067953920724noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1405318705472934452.post-45046919390300323582011-12-19T16:32:47.789-05:002011-12-19T16:32:47.789-05:00Even older now, but worked like a charm.
ThanksEven older now, but worked like a charm.<br /><br />ThanksAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1405318705472934452.post-84449301185629688972011-11-09T06:17:14.136-05:002011-11-09T06:17:14.136-05:00Agree with previous comment: an old post but has b...Agree with previous comment: an old post but has bailed me out of a problem. This is THE way to receive multicast messages.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1405318705472934452.post-39662050287253679212008-10-23T09:54:00.000-04:002008-10-23T09:54:00.000-04:00An old post, but it saved quite a bit of time. Tha...An old post, but it saved quite a bit of time. Thanks man, very helpful!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1405318705472934452.post-49761913264663265842008-04-18T07:54:00.000-04:002008-04-18T07:54:00.000-04:00Hey anon...The port and multicast group you select...Hey anon...<BR/><BR/>The port and multicast group you select are really up to you, as long as you select the appropriate range between from 224.0.0.0 to 239.255.255.255. These addresses are used to establish groups, they don't point to a specific physical address on the network. A bit of a reference is here: http://www.tcpipguide.com/free/t_IPMulticastAddressing.htm<BR/><BR/>Make sure multicast is working on your network, and between your client and server, I have found this utility quite useful...<BR/><BR/>http://www.mikkle.dk/multicasttest/<BR/><BR/>You did notice in the code sample that the listener.Connect(groupEP) line was commented out, that was meant to indicate that you should not issue that connect.<BR/><BR/>Does any of that help? MCAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08560846342306382608noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1405318705472934452.post-37662273957012232332008-04-17T04:45:00.000-04:002008-04-17T04:45:00.000-04:00I tried the example exactly as displayed by you: s...I tried the example exactly as displayed by you: sorry, I didn't work, since after writing "Waiting for broadcast" it hangs.<BR/><BR/>I followed you suggestions (marked in red).<BR/><BR/>Which groupPort should I use and which ip multicast address?<BR/><BR/>How will I determine the'm for my actual configuration.<BR/><BR/>Many thanks in advance,<BR/>PhilipAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1405318705472934452.post-63344857115151613922008-02-13T17:01:00.000-05:002008-02-13T17:01:00.000-05:00It saved me a headache. Tried the MSDN ones which...It saved me a headache. Tried the MSDN ones which failed, then found this which works! Awesome! Thanks!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com